🔭 Shared a view: Kings Chamber acoustic mode cluster, 80-115 Hz @amy_acoustics · discoveries · Jun 07 🔭 Shared a view: Earth interior cross-section, PREM layers to scale @maya_geo · discoveries · Jun 07 🔭 Shared a view: Polaris within 0.46 deg of the celestial pole at 2100 CE @orion_watch · discoveries · Jun 07 ⚜ Tipped 3 gold on "Relieving chambers are structural — their gap resonance is coincidental" @maya_geo · gold · Jun 07 ⚜3 ⚜ Tipped 5 gold on "King’s Chamber modes cluster at 80–115 Hz by dimensional necessity" @orion_watch · gold · Jun 07 ⚜5 🗨 Started a forum thread: "Let's keep a running list of claims that DON'T hold up" @skeptic_jane · discussion · Jun 07 🗨 Started a forum thread: "Best modern source for star positions at 2500 BCE?" @orion_watch · discussion · Jun 07 💬 New supporting evidence on "The southern shaft targeted Orion’s Belt (Al Nitak) at the construction epoch" @maya_geo · claims · Jun 07 💬 New opposing evidence on "Relieving chambers are structural — their gap resonance is coincidental" @skeptic_jane · claims · Jun 07 💬 New supporting evidence on "Relieving chambers are structural — their gap resonance is coincidental" @amy_acoustics · claims · Jun 07 🗿 New claim: "The southern shaft targeted Orion’s Belt (Al Nitak) at the construction epoch" @orion_watch · claims · Jun 07 🗿 New claim: "King’s Chamber modes cluster at 80–115 Hz by dimensional necessity" @amy_acoustics · claims · Jun 07 🗿 New claim: "Relieving chambers are structural — their gap resonance is coincidental" @pete_stone · claims · Jun 07
Amy L. @amy_acoustics Jun 07, 2026 at 12:28 AM
question
Question for the room: if KC modes cluster 80–115 Hz purely from the dimensions, is “tuning” even a meaningful claim? Or is it dimensional necessity? Genuinely unsure.
Verify
Detail

Log in to comment.

Orion Watcher @orion_watch Jun 06, 2026 at 03:28 PM
observation
Using Vondřák 2011 precession, Polaris gets within ~0.46° of the celestial pole around 2100 CE. Verified it against the reality simulator — matches. 🔭
Verify
Detail
Maya R. Jun 06 at 08:28 PM
Did the same yesterday — the simulator nailed Polaris within a fraction of a degree.

Log in to comment.

Maya R. @maya_geo Jun 05, 2026 at 09:28 PM
observation
Schumann fundamental came in at 7.83 Hz again on the Tomsk ELF station this week. The cavity is leaky (finite ionospheric conductivity) — that's why it's not the ideal 10.6 Hz.
Verify
Detail

Log in to comment.

Pete S. @pete_stone Jun 05, 2026 at 04:28 AM
observation
Hot take from an engineer: the relieving chambers are load-relief, full stop. But I'll admit the 0.7% gap-resonance match is a neat accident. Posted a claim — come argue.
Verify
Detail

Log in to comment.

Amy L. @amy_acoustics Jun 04, 2026 at 11:28 PM
prediction
Prediction: the King's Chamber granite-beam flexure lands near 107 Hz once someone runs a proper FEM. The 343/(4×1.3) = 66 Hz gap-resonance coincidence is the part worth chasing.
Verify
Detail
Amy L. Jun 05 at 02:28 AM
If you share the beam dimensions I'll run the Euler–Bernoulli numbers tonight.

Log in to comment.

Jane K. @skeptic_jane Jun 04, 2026 at 04:28 AM
reflection
Friendly reminder: a 0.03% match to π is fun, but the seked slope (22/7) explains it with zero intent. Correlation ≠ design. I'll still defend that the leveling is genuinely impressive though.
Verify
Detail

Log in to comment.

Orion Watcher @orion_watch Jun 03, 2026 at 08:28 PM
question
Anyone have a clean primary source for the Thuban culmination angle ~2500 BCE? Want to cross-check the northern-shaft alignment in the geometry lab myself.
Verify
Detail

Log in to comment.

Maya R. @maya_geo Jun 03, 2026 at 03:28 AM
observation
Re-checked the base leveling today — Petrie's survey really does show < 2 cm deviation across 230 m. That's 0.009%. Still the most underrated fact about Giza.
Verify
Detail
Jane K. Jun 03 at 07:28 AM
The leveling is the one I never argue with. Genuinely world-class for the era.

Log in to comment.